Workload placement before platform selection
A practical decision sequence for regional applications, data copies, recovery and operating ownership.
Read the guideEvergreen guides, visible FAQ answers and clearly labelled illustrative scenarios—without fabricated dates, customers or results.
A practical decision sequence for regional applications, data copies, recovery and operating ownership.
Read the guideHow to separate three resilience controls and ask better architecture questions.
Read the guideA five-part checklist for pilots, acceptance criteria, checkpoints and the decision to return.
Read the guideThe scenario is intentionally not a customer story.
A non-customer scenario showing how an ERP workload could be assessed for Hong Kong private cloud and mainland operating sites.
Answers are deliberately scoped. Project-specific locations, targets and commitments are confirmed during design and contracting.
The website does not claim a location before a solution is approved. The assessment maps primary data, replicas, logs, backups and administrative access separately, then records proposed locations, providers, retention and transfer paths for technical and legal review.
No. Hong Kong hosting does not by itself resolve mainland data, cybersecurity, localization, filing or sector requirements. Data classification, entities, systems, transfer paths and applicable rules require case-specific legal and technical review.
Not from a generic webpage. A credible design names user locations, applications, carriers, routes, test periods and acceptance criteria. Any performance or availability commitment must be based on measured scope and contract terms.
It depends on the workload. Private cloud may fit selected stable, sensitive or specialized workloads; public services may fit variable demand or specific managed capabilities. Hybrid architecture combines them only where the operational and governance model remains manageable.
Platform support and migration scope remain [TBD]. A migration assessment should review versions, guest operating systems, storage, networks, licences, backup, dependencies, downtime constraints, validation and rollback before stating compatibility.
The provider SLA, availability definition, measurement method, exclusions, support targets and service credits remain [TBD]. They must be shown as scoped contractual terms rather than an unsupported percentage on a marketing page.
RPO and RTO options remain [TBD] and should be set per workload. The final objectives depend on data change rate, architecture, replication or backup method, alternate capacity, dependencies, runbooks, test frequency and commercial scope.
The approach is discovery, dependency and data-flow review, a representative pilot, approved acceptance criteria, migration checkpoints and a tested rollback decision. The maintenance window cannot be stated until the source environment and application behavior are known.
A scoped quote can include compute, memory, storage capacity and IOPS, licences, locations, connectivity, backup retention, high availability, disaster recovery, migration, monitoring, support and lifecycle work. Pricing and minimum terms remain [TBD].
Support locations, hours, Cantonese, English or Mandarin coverage, escalation paths and response targets remain [TBD]. The published version should state only channels the operating team actively monitors.
Start with workload placement, connectivity, data flows, recovery objectives, migration risk and the full commercial scope.